Constitutional Integrity: Part III - Obama's Respect

Above even the obvious problem that this all seems rather suspect, I'm very curious about how much respect for the Rule of Law and our Constitution the DNC and Barak Obama have. After all, we're talking about someone who demanded John McCain release all his medical records, including what color antacids he takes after a chili cookout...something McCain isn't required BY LAW to disclose or prove. But when asked to prove his basic eligibility Obama files a motion to dismiss...and it's interesting to note that more than just his birth certificate is "unavailable":

* Occidental College records - not released.
* Columbia Thesis paper - not available, locked down by faculty.
* Harvard College records - not released, locked down by faculty.
* Selective Service Registration - not released.
* Medical records - not released (only a one-page report).
* Illinois State Senate schedule - 'not available.'
* Law practice client list - not released.
* Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - not released.
* Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth - not released.
* Harvard Law Review articles published - None.
* University of Chicago scholarly articles - None.
* Record of Baptism-- Not released or 'not available.'
* Illinois State Senate records--'not available.'

Moreover, on an entirely unrelated (though still important) issue, further investigation led to Obama's State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record, wherein when asked for "Full Former Names" Obama put "None", even though (as shown above) he's gone by other full names. So he lied on the State government form he signed under Penalty of Perjury.

You'd think that someone who advocated national unity and bipartisanship, and claimed to want to bring America to new heights would actually just show his birth certificate, so it would all be over. Instead, Obama and the DNC, and the FEC chose to hide behind procedurals. Allow me to explain. In Obama et. all's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, there is an assertion that the allegations are "patently false." But, the team made a choice to spend all that money to get the lawsuit dismissed on procedural grounds before a trial on the merits. Maybe they did it so there would be precedent. But why would anyone WANT to set such a precendent? Why would anyone WANT to waste the time and money involved to prove that ordinary citizens don't have the right to sue to ask a court to enforce Article II's requirements for someone who wants to be president??? MOREOVER, why would the DNC not want to protect its reputation? Here's the thing, if Obama et. all got their way, the lawsuit would be dismissed. So they "technically" win without having proven that (1) Obama can be president; (2) that the DNC did nothing wrong; (3) the FEC did nothing wrong. It's obvious from the complaint that if Obama could show his birth certificate and it could be verified, the lawsuit would be dropped...

It makes me sad.